Welcome to YC Enviornment, which isn’t a high secret battle membership for Y Combinator founders, however a collection of video games that provide you with a imprecise sense of what it’s wish to be a companion at YC.
Created by a scholar in Berlin, YC Enviornment’s YC Accomplice Simulator sport reveals you a publicly obtainable pitch video from an organization that utilized to YC, together with the yr of their software. You click on “settle for” or “reject,” after which discover out should you made the identical alternative as YC.
It’s loads more durable than it seems to be. YC is estimated to simply accept round 1% of candidates, and at a sure level, some luck is required to essentially seize a companion’s eye — perhaps your pitch is the primary {that a} companion watched after a really rejuvenating espresso break, or perhaps your organization is the final video on the checklist, and everybody’s drained.
“Many rejected founders went on to construct extremely profitable firms afterwards,” reads a word firstly of the sport. “Rejection means nothing – even probably the most profitable founders received rejected a number of occasions.”
YC Enviornment has different video games that ask you to match an organization identify to its brand, or guess what yr an organization did YC primarily based on its description (spoiler alert: there’s much more AI lately). However the YC Accomplice Simulator sport is probably the most fascinating because it makes us confront our personal decision-making processes.
As a tech journalist, I assumed I’d be fairly good on the YC Accomplice Simulator. I will not be an investor, however I do know what it’s wish to sift by means of an inbox stuffed with startup pitches and select which of them pique my curiosity — I’ve walked the ground of TechCrunch Disrupt’s Battlefield 200 Expo with the duty of figuring out firms to interview and write about. However this sport is tough. In any case, we’re working inside completely different parameters, because the newsworthiness of an organization shouldn’t be straight tied to its potential to show a revenue.
(For instance: as I write this, there’s an AI pet sitting in my lap that I’m planning to overview. Would I put cash on the wager that Casio will flip a revenue off of the funding it takes to create a glorified Furby that retails for $430? No. Do I count on that an article about my life with an AI pet can be fascinating to readers? Sure.)
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
If something, the sport reveals simply how subjective these processes will be. However after I learn YC co-founder Paul Graham’s software information, my guesses began to get extra correct.
“It’s important to be exceptionally clear and concise,” Graham wrote. “No matter it’s a must to say, give it to us proper within the first sentence, within the easiest potential phrases.” (For the document, this recommendation additionally applies to emailing journalists.)
I performed the sport once more, however this time, I paid much less consideration to what the corporate was pitching and extra consideration to how rapidly they might convey what their firm does. In fact, I wouldn’t suggest this technique for evaluating a startup in actual life (sizzling take: it is best to care what an organization does!), however for the needs of the sport, I ended up selecting an organization’s destiny extra precisely.
This most likely isn’t a coincidence. When OpenAI founder and CEO Sam Altman was president of YC, he remarked in an interview that the incubator spent simply 10 minutes reviewing every firm’s software to decide.
“It seems that in 10 minutes, if the one query you’re attempting to reply is, ‘Does this individual have the potential to be the subsequent Mark Zuckerberg?’ … You’ll be able to reply that query in 10 minutes,” Altman mentioned in 2016. “Not with 100% accuracy, clearly, however ok that our enterprise mannequin works.”
