Shortly after Hunter Lightman joined OpenAI as a researcher in 2022, he watched his colleagues launch ChatGPT, one of many fastest-growing merchandise ever. In the meantime, Lightman quietly labored on a group educating OpenAI’s fashions to unravel highschool math competitions.
Immediately that group, referred to as MathGen, is taken into account instrumental to OpenAI’s industry-leading effort to create AI reasoning fashions: the core expertise behind AI brokers that may do duties on a pc like a human would.
“We have been making an attempt to make the fashions higher at mathematical reasoning, which on the time they weren’t excellent at,” Lightman instructed TechCrunch, describing MathGen’s early work.
OpenAI’s fashions are removed from good at present — the corporate’s newest AI techniques nonetheless hallucinate and its brokers wrestle with advanced duties.
However its state-of-the-art fashions have improved considerably on mathematical reasoning. One in every of OpenAI’s fashions not too long ago gained a gold medal on the Worldwide Math Olympiad, a math competitors for the world’s brightest highschool college students. OpenAI believes these reasoning capabilities will translate to different topics, and finally energy general-purpose brokers that the corporate has all the time dreamed of constructing.
ChatGPT was a cheerful accident — a lowkey analysis preview turned viral shopper enterprise — however OpenAI’s brokers are the product of a years-long, deliberate effort inside the firm.
“Finally, you’ll simply ask the pc for what you want and it’ll do all of those duties for you,” stated OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on the firm’s first developer convention in 2023. “These capabilities are sometimes talked about within the AI area as brokers. The upsides of this are going to be large.”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
Whether or not brokers will meet Altman’s imaginative and prescient stays to be seen, however OpenAI shocked the world with the discharge of its first AI reasoning mannequin, o1, within the fall of 2024. Lower than a 12 months later, the 21 foundational researchers behind that breakthrough are probably the most extremely sought-after expertise in Silicon Valley.
Mark Zuckerberg recruited 5 of the o1 researchers to work on Meta’s new superintelligence-focused unit, providing some compensation packages north of $100 million. One in every of them, Shengjia Zhao, was not too long ago named chief scientist of Meta Superintelligence Labs.
The reinforcement studying renaissance
The rise of OpenAI’s reasoning fashions and brokers are tied to a machine studying coaching approach referred to as reinforcement studying (RL). RL supplies suggestions to an AI mannequin on whether or not its selections have been appropriate or not in simulated environments.
RL has been used for many years. For example, in 2016, a couple of 12 months after OpenAI was based in 2015, an AI system created by Google DeepMind utilizing RL, AlphaGo, gained international consideration after beating a world champion within the board sport, Go.
Round that point, one among OpenAI’s first staff, Andrej Karpathy, started pondering find out how to leverage RL to create an AI agent that might use a pc. However it could take years for OpenAI to develop the mandatory fashions and coaching strategies.
By 2018, OpenAI pioneered its first massive language mannequin within the GPT collection, pretrained on large quantities of web knowledge and a big clusters of GPUs. GPT fashions excelled at textual content processing, ultimately resulting in ChatGPT, however struggled with primary math.
It took till 2023 for OpenAI to attain a breakthrough, initially dubbed “Q*” after which “Strawberry,” by combining LLMs, RL, and a method known as test-time computation. The latter gave the fashions further time and computing energy to plan and work by way of issues, verifying its steps, earlier than offering a solution.
This allowed OpenAI to introduce a brand new strategy known as “chain-of-thought” (CoT), which improved AI’s efficiency on math questions the fashions hadn’t seen earlier than.
“I might see the mannequin beginning to motive,” stated El Kishky. “It might discover errors and backtrack, it could get pissed off. It actually felt like studying the ideas of an individual.”
Although individually these strategies weren’t novel, OpenAI uniquely mixed them to create Strawberry, which straight led to the event of o1. OpenAI shortly recognized that the planning and truth checking talents of AI reasoning fashions could possibly be helpful to energy AI brokers.
“We had solved an issue that I had been banging my head towards for a few years,” stated Lightman. “It was some of the thrilling moments of my analysis profession.”
Scaling reasoning
With AI reasoning fashions, OpenAI decided it had two new axes that might permit it to enhance AI fashions: utilizing extra computational energy through the post-training of AI fashions, and giving AI fashions extra time and processing energy whereas answering a query.
“OpenAI, as an organization, thinks so much about not simply the way in which issues are, however the way in which issues are going to scale,” stated Lightman.
Shortly after the 2023 Strawberry breakthrough, OpenAI spun up an “Brokers” group led by OpenAI researcher Daniel Selsam to make additional progress on this new paradigm, two sources instructed TechCrunch. Though the group was known as “Brokers,” OpenAI didn’t initially differentiate between reasoning fashions and brokers as we consider them at present. The corporate simply needed to make AI techniques able to finishing advanced duties.
Finally, the work of Selsam’s Brokers group grew to become half of a bigger challenge to develop the o1 reasoning mannequin, with leaders together with OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever, chief analysis officer Mark Chen, and chief scientist Jakub Pachocki.
OpenAI must divert treasured sources — primarily expertise and GPUs — to create o1. All through OpenAI’s historical past, researchers have needed to negotiate with firm leaders to acquire sources; demonstrating breakthroughs was a surefire approach to safe them.
“One of many core parts of OpenAI is that all the pieces in analysis is backside up,” stated Lightman. “Once we confirmed the proof [for o1], the corporate was like, ‘This is smart, let’s push on it.’”
Some former staff say that the startup’s mission to develop AGI was the important thing think about reaching breakthroughs round AI reasoning fashions. By specializing in creating the smartest-possible AI fashions, reasonably than merchandise, OpenAI was in a position to prioritize o1 above different efforts. That kind of huge funding in concepts wasn’t all the time doable at competing AI labs.
The choice to attempt new coaching strategies proved prescient. By late 2024, a number of main AI labs began seeing diminishing returns on fashions created by way of conventional pretraining scaling. Immediately, a lot of the AI area’s momentum comes from advances in reasoning fashions.
What does it imply for an AI to “motive?”
In some ways, the aim of AI analysis is to recreate human intelligence with computer systems. For the reason that launch of o1, ChatGPT’s UX has been crammed with extra human-sounding options similar to “pondering” and “reasoning.”
When requested whether or not OpenAI’s fashions have been actually reasoning, El Kishky hedged, saying he thinks in regards to the idea by way of laptop science.
“We’re educating the mannequin find out how to effectively expend compute to get a solution. So in case you outline it that method, sure, it’s reasoning,” stated El Kishky.
Lightman takes the strategy of specializing in the mannequin’s outcomes and never as a lot on the means or their relation to human brains.
“If the mannequin is doing laborious issues, then it’s doing no matter vital approximation of reasoning it wants with a purpose to try this,” stated Lightman. “We will name it reasoning, as a result of it appears to be like like these reasoning traces, nevertheless it’s all only a proxy for making an attempt to make AI instruments which are actually highly effective and helpful to lots of people.”
OpenAI’s researchers be aware individuals might disagree with their nomenclature or definitions of reasoning — and certainly, critics have emerged — however they argue it’s much less necessary than the capabilities of their fashions. Different AI researchers are likely to agree.
Nathan Lambert, an AI researcher with the non-profit AI2, compares AI reasoning modes to airplanes in a weblog publish. Each, he says, are artifical techniques impressed by nature — human reasoning and fowl flight, respectively — however they function by way of completely totally different mechanisms. That doesn’t make them any much less helpful, or any much less able to reaching comparable outcomes.
A gaggle of AI researchers from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind agreed in a latest place paper that AI reasoning fashions will not be nicely understood at present, and extra analysis is required. It might be too early to confidently declare what precisely is happening inside them.
The following frontier: AI brokers for subjective duties
The AI brokers available on the market at present work greatest for well-defined, verifiable domains similar to coding. OpenAI’s Codex agent goals to assist software program engineers offload easy coding duties. In the meantime, Anthropic’s fashions have grow to be notably fashionable in AI coding instruments like Cursor and Claude Code — these are a few of the first AI brokers that individuals are prepared to pay up for.
Nevertheless, basic objective AI brokers like OpenAI’s ChatGPT Agent and Perplexity’s Comet wrestle with most of the advanced, subjective duties individuals need to automate. When making an attempt to make use of these instruments for on-line buying or discovering a long-term parking spot, I’ve discovered the brokers take longer than I’d like and make foolish errors.
Brokers are, in fact, early techniques that can undoubtedly enhance. However researchers should first determine find out how to higher practice the underlying fashions to finish duties which are extra subjective.
“Like many issues in machine studying, it’s an information downside,” stated Lightman, when requested in regards to the limitations of brokers on subjective duties. “Among the analysis I’m actually enthusiastic about proper now is determining find out how to practice on much less verifiable duties. Now we have some leads on find out how to do these items.”
Noam Brown, an OpenAI researcher who helped create the IMO mannequin and o1, instructed TechCrunch that OpenAI has new general-purpose RL strategies which permit them to show AI fashions abilities that aren’t simply verified. This was how the corporate constructed the mannequin which achieved a gold medal at IMO, he stated.
OpenAI’s IMO mannequin was a more moderen AI system that spawns a number of brokers, which then concurrently discover a number of concepts, after which select the very best reply. A majority of these AI fashions are gaining popularity; Google and xAI have not too long ago launched state-of-the-art fashions utilizing this method.
“I believe these fashions will grow to be extra succesful at math, and I believe they’ll get extra succesful in different reasoning areas as nicely,” stated Brown. “The progress has been extremely quick. I don’t see any motive to suppose it should decelerate.”
These strategies might assist OpenAI’s fashions grow to be extra performant, good points that might present up within the firm’s upcoming GPT-5 mannequin. OpenAI hopes to say its dominance over rivals with the launch of GPT-5, ideally providing the greatest AI mannequin to energy brokers for builders and shoppers.
However the firm additionally desires to make its merchandise less complicated to make use of. El Kishky says OpenAI desires to develop AI brokers that intuitively perceive what customers need, with out requiring them to pick out particular settings. He says OpenAI goals to construct AI techniques that perceive when to name up sure instruments, and the way lengthy to motive for.
These concepts paint an image of an final model of ChatGPT: an agent that may do something on the web for you, and perceive the way you need it to be finished. That’s a a lot totally different product than what ChatGPT is at present, however the firm’s analysis is squarely headed on this route.
Whereas OpenAI undoubtedly led the AI {industry} a couple of years in the past, the corporate now faces a tranche of worthy opponents. The query is now not simply whether or not OpenAI can ship its agentic future, however can the corporate achieve this earlier than Google, Anthropic, xAI, or Meta beat them to it?
